Denver voters reject sick leave bill


Continued from page 1

Bennett noted that industry groups spent more than $837,000 to defeat Initiative 300. Supporters of the measure reportedly collected contributions totaling $462,984 from outside supporters such as 9to5, National Association of Working Women and Family Values@Work.

If adopted, Initiative 300 would have required employers to offer paid sick leave to full and part-time employees, up to a maximum of 72 hours per year at businesses with 10 or more employees and a maximum of 40 hours for staffers at smaller companies.

Opponents of the mandate celebrated the results, saying the proposal as written would have done more damage than good for businesses struggling against economic headwinds.

“We truly appreciate Denver voters for rejecting the false and negative attacks on restaurants, and voting against this job-killing proposal,” said Pete Meersman, president and chief executive of the Colorado Restaurant Association.

Matthew Halme, vice president of government affairs and corporate counsel for OSI Restaurant Partners LLC, operator of Outback Steakhouse and other brands, spoke as a board member for the Profit Per Employee Coalition, saying, “Clearly, voters were astute enough to make the obvious connection between these types of mandates and job loss.

“Mandatory leave proponents think these types of workplace and social mandates are good public policy goals,” he added. “Employers and voters are pragmatists who acutely understand that these mandates don’t happen in a vacuum and they aren’t free. The cost is almost always job loss and economic stagnation.”

Contact Lisa Jennings at
Follow her on Twitter: @livetodineout