Soda Industry Takes City of San Francisco to Court Over Warning Label Requirement

Soda Industry Takes City of San Francisco to Court Over Warning Label Requirement
Soda Industry Takes City of San Francisco to Court Over Warning Label Requirement

Photo Modified: Flickr/SoxFanInSD/CC 2.0

The legislation was unanimously passed in June by San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors. 

In retaliation against San Francisco’s newly passed labeling legislation — which requires advertisements for drinks containing added sugar to include a warning label about the adverse effects of sugarthe American Beverage Association has filed a lawsuit against the city, citing the First Amendment.

In the lawsuit, the ABA claims that San Francisco is trying to “ensure that there is no free marketplace of ideas, but instead only a government-imposed, one-sided public ‘dialogue’ on the topic — in violation of the First Amendment.”

Furthermore, the ABA says that the warning singles out sugary beverages, while advertisements for other sugary foods do not carry a warning. Advertisements posted in San Francisco will soon feature the following message:

“WARNING: Drinking beverages with added sugar(s) contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay. This is a message from the City and County of San Francisco.”

These signs will be posted in public advertising spaces including billboards, buses, transit shelters, posters, and stadiums.

Related Links
San Francisco Wants to Put Warning Labels on SodaBritish Supermarket Chain Tesco Bans Sugary Drinks to Fight Childhood ObesityMarion Nestle: The Soda Industry’s Promises Mean NothingAmerican Beverage Association Fights Back on Soda BanNow Los Angeles Is Considering a Soda Ban

Around the Web