Toby Keith’s Anti-Gun Restaurant Angers Packing Patrons

'I Love This Bar and Grill' wants you to leave the heat in the kitchen

Keep your firearms at home, Virginian food lovers!

For those who like to eat and shoot, you may want to stay out of country star Toby Keith’s anti-gun establishment. The I Love This Bar and Grill in Woodbridge, Va., enforced a "No Guns Allowed" policy over the weekend that actually has some patrons upset. Eater reported that the restaurant defended their new policy on Facebooksaying, "… we at Toby Keith's I Love This Bar and Grill, with guidance from the State of Virginia and based on insurance regulations, have adopted a no weapons policy. It is our desire to provided [sic] a safe, enjoyable and entertaining experience for our patrons and staff."

While some are in support of the enforced "family-friendly environment," some commenters felt that it was a poor choice to exclude gun-toters from the establishment, despite the fact that owners are allowed to choose the policy.

The Internet uproar is slightly surprising. Despite the fact that it isn’t technically illegal to carry a gun, mixing guns and booze is, according to Virginia State law: "Any person permitted to carry a concealed handgun who is under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs while carrying such handgun in a public place is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor..."

With the law and some local support on its side, the country singer’s place shouldn't be under too much fire, both literally and figuratively!

Be a Part of the Conversation

Have something to say?
Add a comment (or see what others think).

Comments 1

Like this story? Get updates by email, facebook and twitter
Get daily food and wine coverage

Latest from The Daily Meal

The Daily Meal Video Network
How to Make an Icing Daffodil



NO one said they have to be drinking in the establishment they might be there for dinner sober and legally carrying a weapon for personal/family safety. Pretty lame for the NRA official singer spokesman to make such a faux pas on this one. Don't "pretend" that the decision was either required by law or the only option it was choice and that is the point CHOICE was removed by the owners to be protected or not. The backlash will be high on this one

Add a Comment

Upload a picture of yourself no larger than 3MB, please see Terms for details
Please answer this Captcha to prove you are human
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Please answer this Captcha to prove you are human