- Juan Mari Arzak born (1942)
FTC Rules POM Health Claims in Ads Were Misleading
POM v. FTC
POM v. FTC
Recipe of the day
- The Viral Infographic Showing What a Can of Coca-Cola Does to Your Body Was Inaccurate
- Another Almond Milk Brand Is Facing a Lawsuit for Not Using Enough Almonds
- Tired of Fruitless Searching? Now You Can Order a Personalized ‘Share a Coke With…’ Bottle
- 10 Fruits to Add to Your Water That Will Totally Benefit Your Body
- This Miracle Drink Could Ensure That You Never Get a Hangover Again
After two years of fighting it out over POM's advertisements, the FTC has issued its final ruling on whether the drink's misled the public with its health claims that the drink could "treat, prevent, or reduce the risk of heart disease, prostate cancer, and erectile dysfunction." The answer? Yes, its claims were deceiving.
Reuters reports that the FTC upheld its earlier ruling of the same sentiment; now, the FTC has given the orders to POM that they can't make any health claims in ads, unless the claims were backed up by two randomized human trials.
Of course, POM still plans to fight back on the decision, saying in a statement that in order to prove certain health claims, the FTC "would require food companies to conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in order to talk about potential health benefits of fruits and vegetables." POM also noted that the company spent more than $35 million to back up its original health claims. Should we expect some more "suck it, FTC" ads in the future, POM?
Be a Part of the Conversation
Join the Daily Meal's Community and Share your Thoughts