Fruit Roll-Ups Company Sued for Misleading Packaging
Recipe of the day
- What Did The World's Most Notorious Criminals Request for Their Last Meals?
- ‘World’s Hottest Burger’ is Doused in Hot Sauce and Literally Set on Fire
- KFC is Launching Edible Coffee Cups Made of Cookies and Chocolate
- Fermented Shark and 10 More of the World’s Stinkiest Foods
- Foods That Make You Feel Fuller Longer
- Attention: The Girl Scouts Have Come Out With a Thin Mint Ice Cream Sandwich
- Cotton Candy Oreos Are the Newest Product from the Oreo Rumor Mill
- High-Tech Utensils Prevent You From Overeating
- EXCLUSIVE: Tic Tac Launches First New Mint Flavor in Years: Intense Spearmint Mix
- Missing Your Banned British Chocolate? Now You Can Order it Online
General Mills Inc. is being sued over claims that the packaging for Fruit Roll-Ups and Fruit by the Foot leads consumers to believe the products contain "real fruit." The person behind the lawsuit is Annie Lam from Daly City, Calif., who brought the class action suit against General Mills on behalf of nationwide consumers.
U.S. District Judge Samuel Conti ruled Thursday that the packaging for these products could have led a consumer to believe that the snacks contain fruit, despite claims from General Mills that the ingredients list fruit from concentrate on the labels. Lam explained that the fruit from concentrate in the snacks, according to the labels, does not represent the flavors of the products — for instance, the strawberry Fruit Roll-Up contains pear concentrate, but no strawberry.
The court also agreed with Lam's claims that the packaging on these products could lead consumers to believe that the snacks are healthy and nutritious, contrary to the listed ingredients, which include dried corn syrup, partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil, and sugar, among many other things.
Check back for updates as the case, Lam v. General Mills Inc. unfolds.
Be a Part of the Conversation
Join the Daily Meal's Community and Share your Thoughts